New JVC DLA-RS1 1080p D-ILA Projector
- Autore discussione francis
- Data d'inizio
obiwankenobi
New member
...e prima di farlo leggi per favore la sezione del Regolamento del Forum che è relativa ai co-buy, che ti riporto qui di seguito per comodità:B.K. ha detto:
Qui ci sono le prime impressioni della demo che Elliot ha tenuto in Inghilterra.
Per gli Inglesi, quella di oggi è stata la prima volta in cui hanno potuto vedere l'HD1, nell' usuale confronto con il Pearl.
Copio un post, ma altre più dettagliate impressioni dovrebbero venire postate in seguito.
"Right, finally had time to write a few words following my hour in the demo room.
I’ll state upfront that I’m not a technical guru, and don’t really have a deep interest in the tech involved, a basic knowledge is good enough for me. I just know what I like when I see it.
I’ve been looking for a new projector for some time, and have bought several LCD’s, including Sanyo, Hitachi, Sony (HS50 and 60) and lately the Panasonic AX100 to keep me going. To be fair, they have all offered excellent performance for the modest cost. Unfortunately, I suffer rainbows badly, so DLP has always been out of the question. The C3X is a stunning unit, but simply outside of my budget….by some margin!
I have been considering the Pearl for some time, and almost pulled the trigger twice on a purchase. The two things that held me back are the DI, even as discrete as the Pearls is, and potential convergence problems.
After all the hype of the JVC, the opportunity to compare directly to the Pearl was too good to be missed. So onto the observations.
Black Screen
The first thing that struck me was the screen when no image was being projected. The Pearl was lighter around the edge, and darker in the middle. The JVC was even over the screen.
Black Level
Through all the material we saw, both HD-DVD and SD, the JVC showed deeper black levels than the Pearl. However, whilst the black levels were blacker, the brighter whites of the JVC shone out, and simply gave the JVC picture the real punch. Elliot fed both projectors simultaneously, so could simply switch the picture by blocking the lens of either one. This made it very clear of the differences involved, although in most cases wasn’t really necessary as just watching one clip after another was clear enough.
The best example I can give is watching the opening scene to Sahara on HD-DVD. The picture looked spectacular on the JVC, with the explosions really jumping from the screen. In comparison, in this difficult dark scene, the Pearl looked a little flat. It also appeared to me that the explosions had a really vibrant orange glow, but on the Pearl the explosions seemed muted. Could this be because the scene is very dark, and the DI at work. I’m not sure.
Sharpness
Again the JVC was the winner to me. Two comparisons spring to mind. The opening scene of Harry Potter on HD-DVD. The detail in the houses and rocks was more obvious. Also, in Sin City, when the camera panned out the detail in the buildings was more obvious to me.
Moire
I’ve seen this on all the projectors I’ve owned. A clip of MI3 was played through the Pearl, where moiré was very obvious in a brick wall. Yet, on the JVC, there was no moiré at all. The Gennum processing clearly at work here.
Upscaling
Both projectors seemed to upscale SD very well.
Summary
I want to be clear, in isolation, the Pearl produces a very nice picture, and I can’t imagine too many owners being unhappy with their purchase. But in every clip I saw tonight, the JVC just produced a fantastic picture that popped from the screen, and in comparison the Pearl just seemed rather flat.
Tomorrow I’ll be popping into to PJ’s with my credit card in hand, which is the best recommendation I could ever make!"
__________________
Per gli Inglesi, quella di oggi è stata la prima volta in cui hanno potuto vedere l'HD1, nell' usuale confronto con il Pearl.
Copio un post, ma altre più dettagliate impressioni dovrebbero venire postate in seguito.
"Right, finally had time to write a few words following my hour in the demo room.
I’ll state upfront that I’m not a technical guru, and don’t really have a deep interest in the tech involved, a basic knowledge is good enough for me. I just know what I like when I see it.
I’ve been looking for a new projector for some time, and have bought several LCD’s, including Sanyo, Hitachi, Sony (HS50 and 60) and lately the Panasonic AX100 to keep me going. To be fair, they have all offered excellent performance for the modest cost. Unfortunately, I suffer rainbows badly, so DLP has always been out of the question. The C3X is a stunning unit, but simply outside of my budget….by some margin!
I have been considering the Pearl for some time, and almost pulled the trigger twice on a purchase. The two things that held me back are the DI, even as discrete as the Pearls is, and potential convergence problems.
After all the hype of the JVC, the opportunity to compare directly to the Pearl was too good to be missed. So onto the observations.
Black Screen
The first thing that struck me was the screen when no image was being projected. The Pearl was lighter around the edge, and darker in the middle. The JVC was even over the screen.
Black Level
Through all the material we saw, both HD-DVD and SD, the JVC showed deeper black levels than the Pearl. However, whilst the black levels were blacker, the brighter whites of the JVC shone out, and simply gave the JVC picture the real punch. Elliot fed both projectors simultaneously, so could simply switch the picture by blocking the lens of either one. This made it very clear of the differences involved, although in most cases wasn’t really necessary as just watching one clip after another was clear enough.
The best example I can give is watching the opening scene to Sahara on HD-DVD. The picture looked spectacular on the JVC, with the explosions really jumping from the screen. In comparison, in this difficult dark scene, the Pearl looked a little flat. It also appeared to me that the explosions had a really vibrant orange glow, but on the Pearl the explosions seemed muted. Could this be because the scene is very dark, and the DI at work. I’m not sure.
Sharpness
Again the JVC was the winner to me. Two comparisons spring to mind. The opening scene of Harry Potter on HD-DVD. The detail in the houses and rocks was more obvious. Also, in Sin City, when the camera panned out the detail in the buildings was more obvious to me.
Moire
I’ve seen this on all the projectors I’ve owned. A clip of MI3 was played through the Pearl, where moiré was very obvious in a brick wall. Yet, on the JVC, there was no moiré at all. The Gennum processing clearly at work here.
Upscaling
Both projectors seemed to upscale SD very well.
Summary
I want to be clear, in isolation, the Pearl produces a very nice picture, and I can’t imagine too many owners being unhappy with their purchase. But in every clip I saw tonight, the JVC just produced a fantastic picture that popped from the screen, and in comparison the Pearl just seemed rather flat.
Tomorrow I’ll be popping into to PJ’s with my credit card in hand, which is the best recommendation I could ever make!"
__________________
Guido310
New member
sasadf Posso solo aspettare ha detto:Ma non dovrebbero essere i tuoi occhi semmai a far crollare la tua aprioristica convinzione (in negativo nel tuo caso) che tanto rimproveri agli altri???
Che c'entriamo noi (o come direbbe un mio compaesano) Che ci azzecchiamo?????
A parte gli scherzi, forse avrai due esemplari molto vicini a te, così magari porti il tuo Mitsu e facciamo un bello Shoot-out, Io sono pronto a ricredermi e a mangiarmi il cappello pubblicamente se dovessi constatare che i 3k (o forse meno) in più spesi non siano giustificabili.
Tanto per cautelarmi (nei rimpianti) ho dato via il Marquee, perche' Lui sì che avrebbe avuto da dire la sua in un confronto con il JVC
Io vedevo a 1080p gia' da un bel pezzo, purtroppo per ragioni logistiche (i famosi problemi di rete elettrica) sono costretto a non possedere più un CRT
Ciao
Micio ha detto:
Prima il BENQ 8720; pareva il vpr definitivo, poi il mitsu 5000 dei quali ormai non parla + nessuno, adesso JVC improvvisamente ha compiuto il miracolo, in un colpo solo ha eliminato tutti i difetti della tecnologia D-ila: costo, durata e costo della lampada, rumorosità, contrasto e livello del nero, ma che bravi! Quello che non erano riusciti a fare in anni lo hanno fatto in pochi mesi
Con tutto il rispetto per i fruitori di vpr LCD..
Ma l' ultimo parere linkato sul confronto con il pearl
per me è indicativo non più di tanto provenendo da chi,
per "colorati" problemi di forza maggiore non ha una grande esperienza
con i DLP....
(per es su come costui intenda il nero dei vpr)
E poi un bel confronto, magister docet, sarebbe ma da fare con un signor
DLP... Anche per dare il peso giusto a tutte le valutazioni comparatistiche
circa il prezzo del JVC rispetto a vpr "dal costo molto superiore": si, superiore ma con quali prestazioni - appunto - rispetto al JVC?
Ma l' ultimo parere linkato sul confronto con il pearl
per me è indicativo non più di tanto provenendo da chi,
per "colorati"
problemi di forza maggiore non ha una grande esperienza con i DLP....
(per es su come costui intenda il nero dei vpr)E poi un bel confronto, magister docet, sarebbe ma da fare con un signor
DLP... Anche per dare il peso giusto a tutte le valutazioni comparatistiche
circa il prezzo del JVC rispetto a vpr "dal costo molto superiore": si, superiore ma con quali prestazioni - appunto - rispetto al JVC?
Qui ci sono proprio delle impressioni relative a un confronto di questo tipo, chi le ha postate ha un C3X.
Va tenuto presente che diversamente dagli americani che si sono già impegnati nel preorder, (caso mai questo fatto li portasse proprio a vedere quello che "vogliono" voler vedere) gli Inglesi non si sono impegnati ancora, possono scegliere se comprare il JVC o comprare qualcos'altro, e molti di loro sono andati alla demo senza avere ancora scelto.
"Just got back from the JVC demo at PJHifi, thanks guys, amazing demo. Please bear in mind, this is just my opinion. To put this into some kind of context, I have been consistently slating non-DLP technology for about 6 months and was very skeptical about the hype surrounding the RS1. I have just bought a C3X and I never thought LCOS would get to the same level of quality as DLP, how wrong I was...
To keep me from sounding like a total fanboy, I'll try and keep this short. If you are thinking of spending over £2000, the only projectors you should be considering at this point are: the RS1 and the C3X. If the D80, the Sharp 20K or the Benq W10000 were the same price as the RS1, I would take the RS1 every time. The D80 is the nearest in quality, and whilst the D80 is sharper, the difference is very, very minimal. The D80 has more depth but £3200 worth? (or £4200 from some dealers). Certainly not. The only single-chip projectors that are obviously better than the RS1 are the HT3000 and the Marantz VP11S1, but £6200 and £8200 (!) better? Categorically not. And there is still the chance that some of your guests might think they are involved in an acid flashback. When LCOS is this good there is no way TI can justify the sort of price they demand for DLP. Welcome to the land of diminishing returns.
Black levels: as good as any DLP I have seen
Colour perfromance: as good as any single-chip.
Processing: both DVDs and 1080i de-interlacing looked immaculate
Sharpness: very, very close to 1080p DLP, the lens is superb.
Image depth: The most important factor for me, the first time I have wanted to take an LCOS projector home with me. Certainly on par with the best 720p DLPs and not too far from 1080p DLP performance.
Brightness: Was producing a nice 8ft image on a 1.3 gain screen. Over 10ft on a neutral screen you might be pushing it. This is another area where it matches, and in some cases, outperforms 1080p DLP.
Noise: louder than the Pearl but still very quiet.
With the C3X, there is a noticeable improvement in image depth, colour and brightness but you will have to make the call as to whether sharp 720p is good enough. I still prefer the C3X's punchiness but considering the 1080p version will be out next year, and the impending devalueing, I almost wish I had never seen the RS1. Oh well, I will just have to drown my sorrows in a 14ft plasma-like screen.
The LCOS pj that beats the RS1 will nail the coffin shut on single-chip."
Va tenuto presente che diversamente dagli americani che si sono già impegnati nel preorder, (caso mai questo fatto li portasse proprio a vedere quello che "vogliono" voler vedere) gli Inglesi non si sono impegnati ancora, possono scegliere se comprare il JVC o comprare qualcos'altro, e molti di loro sono andati alla demo senza avere ancora scelto.
"Just got back from the JVC demo at PJHifi, thanks guys, amazing demo. Please bear in mind, this is just my opinion. To put this into some kind of context, I have been consistently slating non-DLP technology for about 6 months and was very skeptical about the hype surrounding the RS1. I have just bought a C3X and I never thought LCOS would get to the same level of quality as DLP, how wrong I was...
To keep me from sounding like a total fanboy, I'll try and keep this short. If you are thinking of spending over £2000, the only projectors you should be considering at this point are: the RS1 and the C3X. If the D80, the Sharp 20K or the Benq W10000 were the same price as the RS1, I would take the RS1 every time. The D80 is the nearest in quality, and whilst the D80 is sharper, the difference is very, very minimal. The D80 has more depth but £3200 worth? (or £4200 from some dealers). Certainly not. The only single-chip projectors that are obviously better than the RS1 are the HT3000 and the Marantz VP11S1, but £6200 and £8200 (!) better? Categorically not. And there is still the chance that some of your guests might think they are involved in an acid flashback. When LCOS is this good there is no way TI can justify the sort of price they demand for DLP. Welcome to the land of diminishing returns.
Black levels: as good as any DLP I have seen
Colour perfromance: as good as any single-chip.
Processing: both DVDs and 1080i de-interlacing looked immaculate
Sharpness: very, very close to 1080p DLP, the lens is superb.
Image depth: The most important factor for me, the first time I have wanted to take an LCOS projector home with me. Certainly on par with the best 720p DLPs and not too far from 1080p DLP performance.
Brightness: Was producing a nice 8ft image on a 1.3 gain screen. Over 10ft on a neutral screen you might be pushing it. This is another area where it matches, and in some cases, outperforms 1080p DLP.
Noise: louder than the Pearl but still very quiet.
With the C3X, there is a noticeable improvement in image depth, colour and brightness but you will have to make the call as to whether sharp 720p is good enough. I still prefer the C3X's punchiness but considering the 1080p version will be out next year, and the impending devalueing, I almost wish I had never seen the RS1. Oh well, I will just have to drown my sorrows in a 14ft plasma-like screen.
The LCOS pj that beats the RS1 will nail the coffin shut on single-chip."
sasadf
New member
Guido310 ha detto:Ma non dovrebbero essere i tuoi occhi semmai a far crollare la tua aprioristica convinzione (in negativo nel tuo caso) che tanto rimproveri agli altri???
Io rimprovero agli altri non le aprioristiche incensature sulla qualità del prodotto..non avendolo visto non mi pronuncio.
Ciò che censuro, anzi addirittura biasimo, è la leggerezza con la quale molta gente, in primis proprio tu Guido( :nonsifa: ), ha accettato supinamente un prezzo di oltre 6,5K euro, al punto che quasi quasi qualcuno stava anche pensando di alzarlo visti gli Halleluja che si issavano al cielo per l'annuncio dell'arrivo in Italia.
RIcordo a tutti che in USA lo han venduto a quelli di AVS a 3300 dollari..:read:
In tal caso, cioè fosse stato quello il prezzo di questo giocattolo, allora si che il mio Mitsu avrebbe potuto temere di perdere il suo trono....
erfido:A 6.5K assolutamente no, nemmeno fosse una immagine ultramegasuper.
A 5,5K resta inalterata la mia ferma convinzione che il Mitsu come rapporto q/p resta validissimo.
Se arriva a 4.5k (non credo), allora il rapporto di forza potrebbe ribaltarsi qualora le premesse saranno confermate( e su questo ho pochi dubbi: nel senso che visto il D-ila a Milano, considerato da me il miglior digitale mai visto, nn dubito che anche questo sarà un gioiello storico: nel senso che farà storia come il PT-ae100 panasonic).
walk on
sasadf
Questi post di impressioni, di descrizione e di info sull'HD1 riassumono un po' il thread della demo.
"In answer to the question as to what I used for calibration. I only calibrated the Pearl and HD1 with the HD-DVD player output using DVE professional and my usual gretamacbeth probe and colorfacts. Having seen demo's of these tow in the past, where the greyscale and colour were obviously vastly different, I wanted to make sure that they were both as accurate as possible. Both units were optimised for colour accuracy and contrast. I was pleased with how close in colour I got them. With an off board processor we could have manipulated the gamma on the Pearl to make it more punchy and bring out some shadow detail. The JVC just didn't need that help in gamma though.
Lumagen are looking in to putting 24P output on to the Vision range. When I arrived Elliot had been playing with sending 96Hz to the JVC but there were some issues and, although I think it's probably do-able, we didn't want to compromise the evening by faffing around on something like that. It's for another day.
Glad you all had fun and sorry I couldn't make it."
Gordon @ Convergent AV
Retailer
======
"I was only there for around 3 hours, but I think VirusKiller and UrbanT have summed things up very nicely.
The HD1 did look quite sharp yet smooth at the same time, and reminded me very much of a Sony G90 (big 9" tubed CRT) I saw a few weeks ago - a very similar 'look' about it.
Having seen the Optoma HD81 as well, I can say that I much preferred the image of the HD1. It's a pity we couldn't have had a 1080 DLP as a test for overall sharpness and perhaps ANSI comparison with some scenes, but I think it would have been very difficult to do this considering the amount of time we had and the churn of people going in and out.
I also asked Elliot how far back the seats were and thought he said 14ft, and it did look further back than 12ft as that's how far back I sit from my 8ft wide screen. I prefer to sit 1.5 x SW away or closer, and that would certainly be no problem with the HD1.
VK - was that you I met at the screen and swapped sides with?
Gary
"In answer to the question as to what I used for calibration. I only calibrated the Pearl and HD1 with the HD-DVD player output using DVE professional and my usual gretamacbeth probe and colorfacts. Having seen demo's of these tow in the past, where the greyscale and colour were obviously vastly different, I wanted to make sure that they were both as accurate as possible. Both units were optimised for colour accuracy and contrast. I was pleased with how close in colour I got them. With an off board processor we could have manipulated the gamma on the Pearl to make it more punchy and bring out some shadow detail. The JVC just didn't need that help in gamma though.
Lumagen are looking in to putting 24P output on to the Vision range. When I arrived Elliot had been playing with sending 96Hz to the JVC but there were some issues and, although I think it's probably do-able, we didn't want to compromise the evening by faffing around on something like that. It's for another day.
Glad you all had fun and sorry I couldn't make it."
Gordon @ Convergent AV
Retailer
======
"I was only there for around 3 hours, but I think VirusKiller and UrbanT have summed things up very nicely.
The HD1 did look quite sharp yet smooth at the same time, and reminded me very much of a Sony G90 (big 9" tubed CRT) I saw a few weeks ago - a very similar 'look' about it.
Having seen the Optoma HD81 as well, I can say that I much preferred the image of the HD1. It's a pity we couldn't have had a 1080 DLP as a test for overall sharpness and perhaps ANSI comparison with some scenes, but I think it would have been very difficult to do this considering the amount of time we had and the churn of people going in and out.
I also asked Elliot how far back the seats were and thought he said 14ft, and it did look further back than 12ft as that's how far back I sit from my 8ft wide screen. I prefer to sit 1.5 x SW away or closer, and that would certainly be no problem with the HD1.
VK - was that you I met at the screen and swapped sides with?
Gary
Ultima modifica:
==============
"Quiet? did someone say quiet? shhhhhh i'm sleeping!
I was amazed at how quiet 25db is! AND both projectos were running, I could only just hear them when sitting in a chair directly alongside (parallel) and at EAR level! My XBox 360 makes more noise and that's without a disk in it!
Maybe I got the distance wrong, not wanting to back pedal of course.
Elliot can you confirm please? my money is still on 12ft - is there a prize?
===============
OK. I was there for five hours! (Well, I had to avoid the M25 rush hour traffic...).
It is stunning - everything I have been waiting a long time for.
I endorse all of Chris' (UrbanT's) comments. Here are some of my own:
1) The Gennum VXP processing is outstanding. Deinterlacing of SD (PAL) and HD video and film was superb. Scaling was equally impressive - on good quality DVD transfers (e.g. Star Wars Ep. IV, Phantom of the Opera, Robbie Williams Live at the Albert Hall), I detected no ringing.
2) The JVC was considerably sharper than the Pearl. And Elliot considered the Pearl on demo to be amongst the best he has seen. Pretty certain this is primarily down to the lens. When viewing grid patterns, it was clear that the degree of Pearl misconvergence varied across the image. The HD1 misconvergence (1/4 pixel after a single red pixel correction horizonally) appeared to be linear across the panel. i.e. panel misconvergence rather than a lens effect.
3) The differences between Pearl and HD1 were much more apparent on HD-DVD than upscaled DVD. However, the JVC image simply had more depth to it for both types of material.
4) The simulaneous contrast was breathtaking. The droid scene inside the Jawa transported was a revelation in the shadow detail.
5) The colours were glorious and flesh tones were natural.
6) The JVC was simply more colourful and punchy than the Pearl.
7) When fed an 100IRE full screen signal from a Lumagen ProHDP, colour uniformity issues were obvious on the Pearl. The HD1 screen simply looked white!
On the technical side, I spent 20 mins with the HD1's designer, Alex Kobayashi, and can confirm the following:
1) 480i60 and 576i50 are accepted over HDMI.
2) 1080p24 is accepted, frame doubled to 1080p48 and displayed using 96Hz processing at the D-ILA panel.
3) 1080i50 and 1080p50 are accepted and displayed using 100Hz processing at the panel.
4) 1080i60 and 1080p60 are accepted and displayed using 120Hz processing at the panel.
5) 1080p48 is not in the EDID table.
6) JVC are looking to see if the vertical stretch feature is possible.
7) Firmware upgrades are technically possible, but I got the feeling that they would require JVC to do them.
8) The blanked off panel is a factory connection for firmware upgrades (in conjunction with the RS232C).
9) Currently, 60i --> 24p processing for the removal of 3:2 cadence judder has not been implemented. I got the impression we wouldn't get this for the HD1. More of an HD2 feature.
10) User editing of the EDID table is not possible (for 576i out of SkyHD boxes).
11) Settings such as DNR (noise reduction) and Sharpness are global memories per physical input. That means that an HDMI switching solution prior to the HD1 precludes easy per-source calibration.
I put in my order for this on Monday morning. Tonight's demo completely justified my faith in all of the pre-production reports we've been getting. The single thing that prevents 10/10 from my perspective is that 480i60 and 1080i60 film material are displayed with 3:2 cadence judder. That's it and of course this is correctable with an external video processor.
I warmly congratulated Alex on his achievement. He and his team have achieved the "impossible" - a projector with virtually no flaws. This one will sell a lot.
Joel
__________________
"Quiet? did someone say quiet? shhhhhh i'm sleeping!
I was amazed at how quiet 25db is! AND both projectos were running, I could only just hear them when sitting in a chair directly alongside (parallel) and at EAR level! My XBox 360 makes more noise and that's without a disk in it!
Maybe I got the distance wrong, not wanting to back pedal of course.
Elliot can you confirm please? my money is still on 12ft - is there a prize?
===============
OK. I was there for five hours! (Well, I had to avoid the M25 rush hour traffic...).
It is stunning - everything I have been waiting a long time for.
I endorse all of Chris' (UrbanT's) comments. Here are some of my own:
1) The Gennum VXP processing is outstanding. Deinterlacing of SD (PAL) and HD video and film was superb. Scaling was equally impressive - on good quality DVD transfers (e.g. Star Wars Ep. IV, Phantom of the Opera, Robbie Williams Live at the Albert Hall), I detected no ringing.
2) The JVC was considerably sharper than the Pearl. And Elliot considered the Pearl on demo to be amongst the best he has seen. Pretty certain this is primarily down to the lens. When viewing grid patterns, it was clear that the degree of Pearl misconvergence varied across the image. The HD1 misconvergence (1/4 pixel after a single red pixel correction horizonally) appeared to be linear across the panel. i.e. panel misconvergence rather than a lens effect.
3) The differences between Pearl and HD1 were much more apparent on HD-DVD than upscaled DVD. However, the JVC image simply had more depth to it for both types of material.
4) The simulaneous contrast was breathtaking. The droid scene inside the Jawa transported was a revelation in the shadow detail.
5) The colours were glorious and flesh tones were natural.
6) The JVC was simply more colourful and punchy than the Pearl.
7) When fed an 100IRE full screen signal from a Lumagen ProHDP, colour uniformity issues were obvious on the Pearl. The HD1 screen simply looked white!
On the technical side, I spent 20 mins with the HD1's designer, Alex Kobayashi, and can confirm the following:
1) 480i60 and 576i50 are accepted over HDMI.
2) 1080p24 is accepted, frame doubled to 1080p48 and displayed using 96Hz processing at the D-ILA panel.
3) 1080i50 and 1080p50 are accepted and displayed using 100Hz processing at the panel.
4) 1080i60 and 1080p60 are accepted and displayed using 120Hz processing at the panel.
5) 1080p48 is not in the EDID table.
6) JVC are looking to see if the vertical stretch feature is possible.
7) Firmware upgrades are technically possible, but I got the feeling that they would require JVC to do them.
8) The blanked off panel is a factory connection for firmware upgrades (in conjunction with the RS232C).
9) Currently, 60i --> 24p processing for the removal of 3:2 cadence judder has not been implemented. I got the impression we wouldn't get this for the HD1. More of an HD2 feature.
10) User editing of the EDID table is not possible (for 576i out of SkyHD boxes).
11) Settings such as DNR (noise reduction) and Sharpness are global memories per physical input. That means that an HDMI switching solution prior to the HD1 precludes easy per-source calibration.
I put in my order for this on Monday morning. Tonight's demo completely justified my faith in all of the pre-production reports we've been getting. The single thing that prevents 10/10 from my perspective is that 480i60 and 1080i60 film material are displayed with 3:2 cadence judder. That's it and of course this is correctable with an external video processor.
I warmly congratulated Alex on his achievement. He and his team have achieved the "impossible" - a projector with virtually no flaws. This one will sell a lot.
Joel
__________________
Guido310
New member
sasadf ha detto:
Come ben sai gli Americani godono di ben altro potere contrattuale, e non solo nel campo dei videoproiettori!
Io ho solo detto, considerato che lo street price poi come al solito sara' minore, che 6500 per un bel D-ila che secondo me si avvicinerà moltissimo al Meridian da 20k
non sono un prezzo poi così fuori da ogni logica, considerando anche i prezzi attuali dei DLP TopQuindi per me, che non amo l'artificiosa resa degli LCD e soffro di Rainbow, è questo il proiettore con il miglior rapporto q/p
E' come passare da un 8" ad un 9", si paga quasi il doppio, ma il miglioramento è notevole. Ho visto i D-ila e gli LCD (ora ho un Epson 700)
e dato quello che cerco in un'immagine, la scelta non puo' essere che una...
Poi se tra poco altri potranno acquistare a 3k un prodotto simile non posso saperlo, fa parte di questo mondo, chi ha preso un DLP 3 chip qualche mese fa che deve fare allora????
Ciao
stazzatleta
Moderatore
Francis, ti supplico, inserisci solo il link ai post dei forum stranieri
)