Posto la traduzione in inglese della terza parte della review sull'OLED Panasonic, comparato con i display HDR-LED-LCD: Sony KD-75X9405C, Samsung UE65JS9590 and Panasonic TX-65CXW804 da parte del sito tedesco digitalfernsehen.
From Germany:
Anyone who has ever studied the credits of a movie, who knows how much effort is operated regards colors, illumination and image general vote, to present the best content.
The image processing takes place here in darkened rooms instead because extraneous light could deceive the perception. So that you are not cheated in the image reproduction in the living room, Panasonic is trying to convey to the TX 65CZW954 the classic values of the movie playback: Natural images instead of artificial diversion are to bear the works of creators bill.
In the test laboratory Panasonic had to compete against the best available HDR-LED-LCDs. HDTV chief editor Christian Trozinski gives an insight into the comparison: "It is remarkable how much progress has made the LED LCD technology, especially in price ranges from 4,000 euros and if Direct-LED lighting along with additional color filters are used, I particularly want to emphasize at this point three displays:.. Sony KD-75X9405C, Samsung UE65JS9590 and Panasonic TX-65CXW804 With these displays you can reach an excellent color reproduction and image brilliance and contrast impression leaves the Most Edge LED LCDs look old.
Compared with the TX-65CZW954 it has quite surprised me how similar the image reproduction fails. Although HDR-LCDs can produce bright images almost double, so the image brilliance with the OLED TV in the movie mode is often comparable - the TX-65CZW954 is therefore not comparable with faint plasma TVs. Conversely, it also falls in dark room hard to distinguish the absolute black of the OLEDs by a slightly lightened black of LCDs when also brilliant details are displayed - the contrast impression is excellent with two display versions. Much more important than questions of detail are the image settings made: Different modes bring completely different results produced - two identical TV models would show different preferences serious differences ". So what is it about the perfect film presentation Is it at the end no matter for which TV? technology you choose Christian Trozinski a hooked: "In the current debate, who displays the best film image, is me often too much theory in the game. Of course it's nice if producers assure that individual color pixel correspond exactly to the original produced, but decides this statement as to whether an image is perceived as good or bad? Hardly.
It is much more important in my eyes, to point out the serious differences that actually decide between 'amazed' and 'pure disappointment'. By OLED technology, the TX-65CZW954 for LCD TVs combines impossible things: The coloration, the contrast impression and the color representation are virtually flawless in every seat and there was in the test a film in which the overall impression seemed unnatural. These services can also be through readings underpin Self darkest image areas still have color information and the brightness and gamma control allows the tracing vote almost a millimeter, so that dark image content divulge too many and not too few details.
Even if it with an LED LCD manages to achieve a similar quality, as is usually sufficient to head movement to provoke artificial lightening and color shifts. The viewing angle of the LCD technology allows a common 'look inside' in dark image areas, who should not or only discreetly visible. The argument that you have to sit far enough away for a LED-LCD as an individual, to compensate for the viewing angle dependence , is a paradox in my eyes, because we are talking about UHD televisions that are to be fed in the future with ultra-HD sources. Based on a 65-inch TV UHD means that one good cook should draw near to eight feet to see the UHD effect can. If we make exactly bleach in LED LCDs already the edges of the image compared to the image center - there is not enough even a strong curvature to compensate for the loss of contrast. IPS LED LCDs, which have a more stable viewing angles, contrast, image contrast of the OLED TVs miss much. "" Unfortunately, it is the fascination that emanates from the TX-65CZW954 to cinematographic, difficult to put into words and also visualize only conditionally, you have to have in a dark environment experienced the TV set properly just once to understand the differences. The TX-65CZW954 knows no drop in quality, no matter how close you get to the display or where you sit. When playing back 3D Blu-rays also comes in joy: The UHD OLED technology is, unlike UHD-LCD panels, the perfect playing partner for the flicker Polarizer 3D method. Who (only in the 3D version) plays movies like 'Guardians of the Galaxy' in IMAX format screen in 3D on the TX-65CZW954, will probably never experience something else again. We sat in the test partly eight feet in front of the XXL display and could not stop being amazed: This image impression surpassed anything we have seen so far.
"Read tomorrow in the fourth part of our XXL Specials: The perfect OLED TV? Panasonic manages to eradicate the errors of previous illumination OLED models?
http://www.digitalfernsehen.de/Panas....132451.0.html
Courtesy of
enator (AVSforum)
.