Visualizzazione Stampabile
Capito. Scusa, avevo frainteso.Citazione:
Originariamente scritto da Dakhan
Comunque, diciamo che la mia avversione per la fotografia digitale è in buona parte "ideologica" :D
Ne comprendo benissimo i vantaggi e riconosco gli enormi passi in avanti dal punto di vista qualitativo. Tuttavia...
Edizione 2007
http://www.blu-ray.com/movies/Bram-S...8/#Screenshots
Edizione 2015
http://www.blu-ray.com/movies/Bram-S...1/#Screenshots
abisso....:eek:
Ragazzi, che differenza... davvero... :eek:
Pero' c'e' il problema del framing... ma non riescono a fare una cosa giusta al 100%?
perchè framing?
The bad news is that, as has been widely discussed around the forums, there's a new controversy, this time surrounding the movie's framing. This review has been posted in conjunction with a review of the 2007 release -- including matching screenshots -- to facilitate user comparison (for a few additional thoughts on both transfers, please click through above and scroll down to the "Video" portion of the review).
The improvements are easy to see, but so too is the fairly drastic alterations to the framing. As noted, screenshot captures have been selected to match, as identically as possible, the same shot from both versions. Even in shots where there's absolutely no horizontal or vertical movement in the camera -- stills, essentially -- there's a noticeable shift upwards and leftwards. Take a look at screenshot #15 in both reviews, a foreboding nighttime establishing shot of Castle Dracula. There's camera movement in the shot, but the captured frame was selected when the movement stops and settles on the same position for a few seconds. Notice the shift? Now look at screenshot #24, a scene in which the camera slowly approaches Mina writing at her desk, pushing inward but offering no up and down or side-to-side movement in the process. The shots may not be perfectly matched to the millisecond, but they're certainly close enough to offer a valid examination, particularly as it's evident there's practically no discernible difference to image depth of field. Again, the newer image appears shifted upwards and leftwards, and aligning, say, the tip of the mouse cursor with a corner on a window, or to make it really easy, the Blu-ray.com watermark, offers a fairly startling contrast in framing. Most other screenshots, including that of the title card, yield the same results. Curiously, a still shot (beyond moving clouds) from the film's beginning, screenshot #27, offers no perceptible framing movement whatsoever.
Differenze si vedono, minime ma ci sono...
Ma il nuovo master è stato supervisionato da Coppola? Non riesco a trovare informazioni definitive in merito.
Leon:
http://t1.someimage.com/kyq4QJz.jpg http://t1.someimage.com/npFD7iM.jpg http://t1.someimage.com/HOrnkA1.jpg http://t1.someimage.com/AUSmXLz.jpg http://t1.someimage.com/DXeeRMX.jpg http://t1.someimage.com/b0LyYvd.jpg http://t1.someimage.com/NWNvyFS.jpg
Qui niente da dire upgrade netto rispetto alle precedenti edizioni...
Il Quinto Elemento:
http://s24.postimg.org/ofj072bgh/fth09.png http://s24.postimg.org/qy9alhmkh/fth10.png
http://s24.postimg.org/i5sbxt1fl/fth11.png http://s24.postimg.org/hhjhev2pt/fth12.png
http://s24.postimg.org/yzsxpnfy9/fth03.png http://s24.postimg.org/vb38q65xd/fth04.png
http://s24.postimg.org/kpjde5zlt/fth05.png http://s24.postimg.org/tlu5i3q81/fth06.png
A quanto sembra dai forum stranieri, l'edizione Gaumont francese rimane superiore perché sono loro ad avere le fonti migliori (credo il negativo). Mi confermate che l'edizione italiana è un porting preciso della francese?
Io sapevo che l'edizione filmauro utilizzava il master gaumont.
Confermo, il nostro BD usa il master gaumont.
Per quel che riguarda il 5° elemento, l'edizione supreme mi delude un pò.
Leon invece è perfetto.
bluray.com dice la sua http://www.blu-ray.com/movies/The-Fi...138634/#Review
le 5 stelle sono assurde IMHO....